Blog Archives

Prop E Won’t Save Teachers and Programs Because CUSD Will Pay Off Old Debts, Vote NO on Prop E

Prop E Won’t Save Teachers Reasonable people think that, in the scheme of things, CUSD seems unconcerned with teachers. When you look at the facts, they’re right. Teachers and pink slips are the dramatic, emotional ploy that CUSD . . . desperate to manipulate Coronado

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Articles

CUSD is Playing a Sneaky Shell Game with $28 Million School Pool Boondoggle, Vote NO on Prop E

Facts The School Pool, also called the BBMAC, will always be one of the many financial elephants in the room for CUSD. CUSD has proven to us that they’re incapable of managing the School Pool. They’ve had around 8 years to

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Articles, School Pool Boondoggle

San Diego County Taxpayers Association’s NEUTRAL Statement Means Vote NO on Prop E

  Background The board members of San Diego County Taxpayers Association (SDCTPA) have almost never met a school bond they didn’t like. SDCTPA board usually always recommends YES on such public bond debt financing schemes because they are usually intended

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Articles, Endorsements

Argument AGAINST Coronado Proposition E – Vote NO on Prop E

  Vote NO on this risky, wasteful, unaffordable property tax hike. CUSD wants to burden property taxpayers with new School Bond Debt while we’re still paying off the old School Bond Debt. Homeowners may face property tax hikes and fee hikes

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Articles, Ballot Arguments

Rebuttal Argument AGAINST Coronado Proposition E – Vote NO on Prop E

Bonds are SUPPOSED to be for capital expenditures — constructing new schools. etc. We are ALREADY paying for such school bonds issued earlier. But this new bond seems to be primarily for OPERATING costs — using much of the bond

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Articles, Ballot Arguments